The JZS Bayes factor weighs the evidence for and against a non-zero Pearson correlation.
Same idea as bayes_ttest, applied to the correlation ρ. BF₁₀ quantifies whether the data favour 'ρ ≠ 0' over 'ρ = 0'. The prior on ρ is a stretched beta — concentrated near 0 by default, widening with the r-scale parameter.
Pair with the frequentist Pearson r when you want both perspectives in the same report. They typically agree directionally; the BF flags when the frequentist 'significant at p = 0.04' result is actually only anecdotal evidence (BF₁₀ ~ 1–3) — the kind of case that fails to replicate.
Two numeric columns + prior r-scale.
BF₁₀ + sample r + posterior median + 95% CrI on ρ + Jeffreys-scale verbal label.
Compare BF₁₀ and the frequentist p side-by-side: BF₁₀ > 10 with p < 0.01 is solid; BF₁₀ ~ 1–3 with p ~ 0.05 is the marginal case where the frequentist result is misleadingly 'significant'.