Precision-based sizing finds the n that gives a confidence interval on a mean a target half-width — the alternative to sizing from a hypothesis test.
Precision-based sample sizing flips the framing of power analysis: instead of 'how many subjects do I need to reject H₀ with 80% probability?', it asks 'how many subjects do I need to estimate the mean to within ±E?'. This is the right framing for descriptive studies (cohort prevalence, biomarker mean) where you're not testing a hypothesis.
The required n grows quadratically with the desired half-width — halving the CI width quadruples the required n.
σ + target half-width E + confidence level.
Required n (or achieved E if n given).
Frame the desired half-width E in terms of clinical significance: 'within ±2 mmol/L of the true mean' is more meaningful than 'within 5% relative error' for most clinicians.